Bug Tracker RSS feed

ID 53🔗
Date: 2014-01-24 09:49:54
Status Closed (Not a Bug)
Category glossaries
Version 4.03
Summary glossaries, multibib and tableofcontents produce "weird error"
OS windows 7 64 bit

Return to Search Results

Sign in to subscribe to notifications about this report.

Description

I have a situation that when I use multibib and glossaries, and I addmore than 10 \newcites (bibliographies) and have a \tableofcontents command then I get "weird error" or a "no room" error.

The bug was extremely tedious to debug (as the error changes if other packages are included or the orderof packages is different), but I found the solution here:

http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=noroom

that using:

\usepackage{morewrites} before the glossaries package solves the problem.

I am uncertain which package is responsible for this problem, but I think other users may find the solution useful. If there is nothing to fix, I believe it may be a useful FAQ entry.

thanks for the awesome latex package!

MWE

Download (1.00K)

% arara: pdflatex: {action: batchmode, draft: yes, options: "-synctex=-1 --src-specials --file-line-error-style"}
% arara: makeglossaries
% arara: pdflatex: {action: nonstopmode, draft: yes, options: "-synctex=-1 --src-specials -halt-on-error -file-line-error-style"}
% arara: pdflatex: {action: nonstopmode, options: "-synctex=-1 --src-specials -halt-on-error -file-line-error-style"}
\documentclass{article}

% if morewrites is commented out, one cannot have more than 10 bibliographies
% (case a) ERROR. compile this as is and it should produce an error
% (case b) OK. uncomment line 11 and it should compile, with any number of \newcites.
% (case c) OK. keep this commented, but switch line 14 with line 15 (comment/uncomment as necessary of course) 
%\usepackage{morewrites}

\usepackage{multibib}
\newcites{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11}
%\newcites{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j}{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}

\usepackage{glossaries}
\makeglossaries

\begin{document}

\tableofcontents

\printglossaries

\end{document}

Evaluation

Thank you for your report. This is a basic limitation of TeX and its limited number of registers. As you mentioned, loading morewrites can fix the problem. An alternative is to use scrwfile. I think this is similar to the problem I get the error: "no room for a new \write". I'll have to close this as "Not a Bug" as I can't provide a fix other than to recommend using morewrites or scrwfile.

Update 2020-02-29: if you have a problem with too many write registers, you may want to consider switching to bib2gls and glossaries-extra as no write registers are required for the glossaries in that case (since the indexing information is written to the aux file).

Comments

0 comments.


Add Comment

Name (optional):

Are you human? Please confirm the bug report ID (which can be found at the top of this page) or login if you have an account. All guest comments have to be manually checked before they appear on the page. There are too many bots trying to spam the site to allow unauthenticated users to post without verification.

Comment:


You can use the following markup:

Block:

[pre]Displayed verbatim[/pre]
[quote]block quote[/quote]

In line:

[tt]code[/tt]
[file]file/package/class name[/file]
[em]emphasized text[/em]
[b]bold text[/b]
[url]web address[/url] [sup]superscript[/sup]
[sub]subscript[/sub]

Ordered list:
[ol]
[li]first item[/li]
[li]second item[/li]
[/ol]

Unordered list:
[ul]
[li]first item[/li]
[li]second item[/li]
[/ul]

You can use the Preview button to review your message formatting before submitting.

Page permalink: https://www.dickimaw-books.com/bugtracker.php?key=53

Return to Search Results